auctusESG logo Eyekyam logo
Internal team explainer

Agentic AI for AdaptFi

A live, visual explanation of how LangGraph turns AI from a one-shot chatbot into a controlled expert workflow for adaptation finance screening.

auctusESG logo Eyekyam logo
AI drafts. Experts sign.
๐Ÿ“„Project docs
๐Ÿง AI agents
๐Ÿ‘คExpert review
๐Ÿ”’Audit record
Powered by LangGraph concepts, explained without technical jargon

Why a chatbot is not enough

A banker or consultant does not need a clever answer. They need a repeatable process, source evidence, human review, and an audit-ready result.

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Normal AI chatbot

Can this project count as adaptation finance?
It appears likely, based on the information provided.
Problem: one answer, weak process, unclear evidence, no formal review gate.
VS
๐Ÿงญ

Agentic AdaptFi workflow

The work is broken into accountable steps. Each step creates evidence. The human expert reviews. The final result is locked into an audit record.

๐Ÿ“„Extract project factsReads uploaded documents and captures structured facts instead of giving a vague opinion.
๐ŸŒฆ๏ธPull hazard profileUses the pinned district hazard snapshot, so the source of climate risk is visible.
๐ŸงฉPropose measuresMatches the project to the adaptation-measures library and explains the rationale.
๐Ÿ‘คHuman confirmsThe expert accepts, edits, or rejects every important draft before it can count.
๐Ÿ”’Lock audit recordDeterministic code computes the final record from confirmed inputs and preserves the trail.
Process Evidence Review Audit

LangGraph in plain English

LangGraph is easiest to explain as a map of workstations. A project file moves through the map. Some stations are AI, some are code, and some are human review gates.

๐Ÿ“

State

The shared project file. It carries facts, draft answers, evidence, reviewer edits, and the final status.

โš™๏ธ

Node

A workstation in the process. One node may extract fields, another may draft eligibility answers, another may run deterministic checks.

โžก๏ธ

Edge

The route between stations. It decides what happens next, such as move to review, ask for correction, or commit the result.

๐Ÿ›‘

Interrupt

A deliberate human pause. The workflow stops and waits until the expert reviews, edits, approves, or sends back.

๐Ÿ’พ

Checkpoint

A saved position in the workflow. AdaptFi can pause, resume, survive failure, and continue later without losing the screening history.

Plain-language version: LangGraph lets us build a serious workflow, not a loose conversation.

The AdaptFi agentic workflow

Each uploaded project becomes a screening thread. The thread moves through specialist agents, deterministic checks, a human review interrupt, and a final signed record.

Screening state

The current working file of one project.

{
  status: "queued",
  district: "pending",
  hazards: [],
  measures: [],
  review: "not started"
}

Message to remember

Agents do the preparation. Code computes the formal rollup. Humans sign the determination of record.

๐Ÿ“„
๐Ÿ“ฅ
Batch intake
Buyer uploads project files
๐Ÿ“„
Extraction agent
Reads docs and extracts fields
๐ŸŒฆ๏ธ
Geo and hazard node
Pulls district hazard snapshot
๐Ÿ”Ž
Research agent
Gathers cited context
๐Ÿงฉ
Measures agent
Proposes adaptation measures
โœ…
Eligibility agent
Drafts MDB/IDFC answers
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ
DNSH agent
Drafts safeguard answers
๐Ÿ‘ค
Expert interrupt
Human reviews and signs
๐Ÿ”’
Deterministic commit
Final record, hash and outputs

Audit trail builds as work happens

Each step leaves a trace.

Project uploaded and screening thread created.
Project facts extracted with source references.
Hazard snapshot pinned to district profile.
Measures and eligibility drafts prepared for review.
Expert confirmed answers and signed the record.
PDF, JSON, CSV and XLSX persisted.

For non-technical users

Think of this as an expert assembly line with memory, evidence, pauses, controls, and a final signed output.

AI drafts. Human experts sign.

This is the most important trust principle in AdaptFi. The AI prepares evidence-backed drafts. The expert remains responsible for the determination.

๐Ÿง 

Agent draft

Proposed answer: The project has documented exposure to extreme heat and water scarcity. The draft answer is Yes for context of vulnerability.
๐Ÿ“Œ District hazard snapshot ๐Ÿ“Ž Project objective ๐Ÿ”— Source cited
๐Ÿ‘ค

Expert review gate

The reviewer checks each drafted answer, reads the evidence, and decides what becomes part of the record.

Status: Awaiting expert action.
๐Ÿ–‹๏ธ

Signed determination

Only the confirmed answers are used to produce the formal AdaptFi output.

EXPERT
SIGNED

Where AI stops and code takes over

This distinction makes the platform defensible. AI drafts the reasoning. Deterministic code computes the formal rollup after human confirmation.

AI drafting layer

Useful for judgement-heavy preparation.

  • โœ“Extract facts from uploaded project documents.
  • โœ“Suggest relevant adaptation measures from the knowledge base.
  • โœ“Draft eligibility and DNSH answers with citations.
  • โœ“Assemble readable narrative sections for review.
๐Ÿง 

Deterministic control layer

Used for final formal outcomes.

  • โœ“Compute MDB/IDFC eligibility rollup from confirmed answers.
  • โœ“Flag DNSH or maladaptation outcomes from confirmed responses.
  • โœ“Pin methodology version, hazard snapshot and inputs hash.
  • โœ“Persist final output artefacts and audit events.
๐Ÿ”’

The audit vault

AdaptFi is useful because a future reviewer can understand not only the conclusion, but exactly how the conclusion was produced.

1
Methodology version pinnedThe screening keeps the exact methodology version that was active when the record was committed.
2
Hazard snapshot pinnedLater changes in district hazard data do not silently alter old results.
3
Inputs hashedThe confirmed project facts, answers and evidence are frozen into a reproducible record.
4
Audit log append-onlyEvery edit, override, approval and signature is recorded with actor, action, time and rationale.
5
Outputs persistedThe report and structured exports are stored at commit. They are not casually regenerated later.

Agents earn trust over time

The system starts conservative. Human experts review everything. Their corrections become the training signal for better future drafts.

๐Ÿ‘ค
Expert reviewsauctusESG experts accept, edit or reject draft answers.
โ†’
๐Ÿงพ
Gold tracesEach expert decision becomes a trusted example.
โ†’
๐Ÿ“Š
EvaluationAgents are measured against expert-approved cases before they do more work.
โš™๏ธ
Better draftsAccuracy improves where the evidence supports it.
โ†’
โฑ๏ธ
Lower review burdenThe expert spends less time correcting routine drafts.
โ†’
๐Ÿ”
Repeatable scaleThe system screens more projects without diluting expert accountability.

The one-slide summary

AdaptFi uses agentic AI to convert adaptation finance screening from a manual, consultant-heavy process into a controlled, evidence-backed, human-signed workflow.

For bankersMore projects can be screened with better consistency and audit readiness.
For consultantsExpert time moves from repetitive preparation to judgement, review and client value.
For the teamLangGraph is the workflow map that keeps agents organised, paused, monitored and accountable.